Showing posts with label Bible Prophecy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible Prophecy. Show all posts

Why Harold Camping’s May 21 Predictions Failed

Everyone knows by now that the Rapture did not take place on May 21, 2011. The day came and went without any serious cataclysms like a great earthquake wreaking havoc across every time zone.


The San Francisco Chronicle managed to contact Harold Camping, the man behind the May 21, 2011 hype, on Sunday. Camping told the Chronicle that he was “flabbergasted” that the Rapture did not take place on May 21. In addition, Camping told the Chronicle that he was looking for answers, which for him means “frequent prayer and consultations with friends”. Several other media outlets report that many followers of Camping are also confused about why the Rapture did not take place on May 21 and are searching for answers.


Today I want to provide an overview of why Harold Camping failed to make accurate predictions concerning May 21.


  • The main reason I believe it is important to write an article about why Camping’s predictions concerning May 21 failed is that there are likely going to be a lot of people looking for answers about why Camping’s prediction failed, particularly the followers of Camping.
  • I also believe it is important to write this article to refute the notion that what happened on May 21 invalidates the Bible and Bible prophecy.

He Failed to Take the Bible at Face Value

Perhaps the main reason why Camping was wrong is that he failed to take the Bible at face value. In my critique of Camping’s May 21 prediction concerning the Rapture I highlighted several areas where his teachings violated what is found in the Bible, including his teaching of a 23 year long great tribulation spanning from 1988 to 2011.


  • The two ways I can envision someone coming up with the idea of a 23 year long great tribulation spanning from 1988 to 2011 is to ignore the details concerning the great tribulation provided in the Bible or to not take the verses concerning the great tribulation at face value. Matthew 24:15-21 is clear that the abomination of desolation spoken of in Daniel (Daniel 9:27) must be established before the great tribulation begins:

Mat 24:15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)

Mat 24:16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:

Mat 24:17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Mat 24:18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.

Mat 24:19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!

Mat 24:20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:

Mat 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

Dan 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.


  • Matthew 24:15 suggests that the establishment of the abomination of desolation is an event that people would see. Daniel 9:27 relates the establishment of the abomination of desolation to the end of (temple) sacrifice. Clearly, we on Earth did not see the end of temple sacrifice in 1988 as there was no Third Temple yet (in fact, we are still awaiting the establishment of the Third Temple).

He Took Bible Verses Out of Context

Camping also failed to consider the textual context of the Bible prophecy verses he cited. The most notable example surrounds Camping's great earthquake prediction.


  • As I mentioned before, Camping cited the great earthquake mentioned in Revelation 16:18 to support his great earthquake prediction on May 21. Revelation 16:18 was taken completely out of context as Camping failed to consider that there are many events that still need to take place before that great earthquake comes. For instance, the kings of earth need to gather for the Battle of Armageddon (an event associated with the pouring of the sixth vial judgment-Revelation 16:12-16) before the great earthquake in Revelation 16:18 (an event associated with the pouring of the seventh vial judgment) can take place.

He Read Things that Were Never There

Camping relied on a very subjective interpretation style that sought to extract "hidden meaning" from the biblical text. Camping would subjectively assign symbolic meaning to numbers and interpret Bible verses in an allegorical manner.


While I read Camping’s work in preparation to write my critique of his May 21 Rapture prediction I noticed that he extracted meaning from Bible verses which made no sense to me when I took those same verses at face value. At some points it almost seemed like Camping was making up stuff to suit his purposes, especially when it came to how he discussed numbers and the supposed significance behind those numbers.


  • Camping's analysis of the seven days in Genesis 7:4 is an example of how he extracted meaning from Bible verses that made no sense to me when I took those same verses at face value. When I read Genesis 7:4 at face value I conclude that God told Noah that He would begin the flood in seven days. However, Camping concluded that there was also a hidden, spiritual message in Genesis 7:4 warning that God would destroy the world in 7000 years, which in Camping’s mind coincided with May 21, 2011. Camping read something in Genesis 7:4 that simply was not there.

He Set a Date and Hour

Many of the Christians who voiced skepticism with Camping’s May 21 Rapture prediction cited Matthew 24:36 where Christ stated that no one except the Father knows the day and hour.


  • Mat 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.


Camping challenged this verse as much as one possibly can by not only naming a date for the Rapture but also the hour when he thought the Rapture would take place: May 21, 2011 at 6 P.M.


Conclusion

The May 21 hype is thankfully over. Camping’s failure should be a lesson to take the Bible at face value, to not ignore the textual context of the Bible verses you cite or use to build an argument, and to avoid reading things in a Bible verse which are not actually there.


Appendix: A Message to Camping Supporters

This message is targeted to anyone who believed in Camping's predictions concerning May 21...


I understand you may be enduring a very tough time right now. You probably made a significant emotional and perhaps even a significant financial investment in May 21. You are probably trying to reconcile the notion that the Bible is inerrant with the fact that the Rapture did not take place on May 21.


Please understand that the Bible did not fail you. Camping failed you. The Word of God did not fail you. A man failed you. The Bible never guaranteed that the Rapture was going to take place on May 21, 2011 or that a great earthquake would impact every time zone on May 21. Camping guaranteed these things and was wrong. His teachings concerning May 21 were unbiblical and the non-events of May 21 demonstrated that.


Please also understand that you are not rejecting biblical authority by rejecting Camping. Biblical authority and Camping authority are not the same thing. The Bible is not wrong. Camping is wrong. Camping is among many people in history who predicted the end of the world on a certain date and failed. Camping is distinguished because he's recently failed to predict the end of the world twice (1994 and 2011). Camping's failure should be a signal to you that his approach to biblical understanding is flawed.

Why Every Bible Prophecy Verse and Chapter Should Matter

There are a variety of viewpoints out there about when the Rapture will take place in context of the End Times. Many people believe it’ll take place prior to the start or at the start of the End Times while others believe it’ll take place sometime during the End Times. Regardless of whether you are a believer in the Pre-Trib, Mid-Trib, Pre-Wrath, or Post-Trib Rapture, I believe it is beneficial for you to try to gain a full understanding of the Book of Revelation and Bible prophecy even if some parts of Bible prophecy may not seem fully relevant to you.


In this article I discuss some important reasons why a person should try to learn as much about Bible prophecy as they can-even if some parts of Bible prophecy may not seem fully relevant to them.


A person who truly wants to understand prophecies about the End Times and/or prophecies about the period before the start of the End Times should try to understand all of the prophecies in the Bible because each prophecy verse is a piece of the puzzle.


  • You cannot put a complete puzzle together if you do not attempt to put all the pieces together. Similarly, you will be unable to gain a complete understanding of what is going to happen in the End Times or perhaps even in the period before the start of the End Times if you do not consider every piece of information available.


By being unconcerned with certain prophecies you also run the risk of developing a misunderstanding of when events will take place. For instance, many people focus on Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39 and believe that Ezekiel 38 and/or Ezekiel 39 could be an event which begins before or at the start of the tribulation (the seven year time period I prefer to call the seventieth week of Daniel). If people ignore the prophecies in the Book of Revelation and the prophecies concerning the Millennium in the Old Testament they are unlikely going to consider the possibility that parts of Ezekiel 38 and/or Ezekiel 39 might actually be related to the invasion at the end of the Millennium mentioned in Revelation 20:7-9 instead of an invasion before the start or at the start of the seventieth week of Daniel:


  • Rev 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
  • Rev 20:8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
  • Rev 20:9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.


I am not saying that Ezekiel 38 and/or Ezekiel 39 apply to the Millennium, but it’s one of the possibilities I’m considering. There is a reason why Gog and Magog are mentioned in Revelation 20, so it’s not something a person should ignore when trying to figure out the timing of Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39.


  • Therefore, a person should attempt to gain as much knowledge as possible so they can figure out which prophesized events are completely relevant to them (and which events are not as relevant to them) and figure out when these events will happen.


You can strengthen your defenses against false teachings by learning more about Bible prophecy. The more Bible prophecy you understand the easier it will become for you to identify when you are confronted with false teachings about the End Times and/or the time period before the End Times. The failure to identify a false teaching can be costly-not only spiritually, but also financially and personally. For instance:


  • A New York man recently spent his entire lifesavings-$140,000-to buy advertisements to promote May 21. Link
  • A New Jersey businessman has been unable to speak with his wife for several months because of his strong belief in May 21. Link
  • One of the sons of the New Jersey businessman recently broke up with his girlfriend who he planned to buy an engagement ring for because she did not believe in May 21 like him. Link


If these individuals had taken time to learn what is actually found in Bible prophecy they could have avoided the financial and/or personal loss they’ve endured so far and might endure after May 21.


  • My critique of the May 21 speculation can be found at this link


Finally, it is useful for a person to understand as much Bible prophecy as possible just in case they end up having to deal with hardship and persecution. I know there are a significant number of people who believe they will not have to endure hardship and persecution in the future, but the costs of being unprepared for the possibility of being wrong is too high in my opinion.


  • If you are unprepared for the worst possible scenarios you risk facing a situation where you may become susceptible to listening to false teachers and false prophets who promise to “help” guide you through difficult times that you may not have expected to face. Recall, the Bible warns that there will be many false prophets who will deceive many prior to the return of Christ (Matthew 24:23-24).
  • A good level of understanding of Bible prophecy may enhance your ability to cope in a time of hardship and persecution since you will have a better understanding/awareness of the dangers you face than someone with no understanding.


I hope this article illustrates why it is useful to learn as much about Bible prophecy as you can even if it seems some chapters are not completely relevant to you. The article I wrote yesterday concerning the parallels between Isaiah 13 and Jeremiah 50 may not seem too relevant to you, but these chapters are pieces of the puzzle. I hope to show in the coming days and weeks how understanding these chapters may help to bring further understanding about the placement of Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39.

The Many Parallels Found in Isaiah 13 and Jeremiah 50

As I have studied several Bible prophecy chapters and verses relating to Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39, I have closely searched for relationships between the chapters and verses under consideration. I often look for specific key words and terms that appear in multiple areas in the Bible in hopes of finding chapters and verses that talk about the same subject manner.


  • The more chapters and verses that you can identify which talk about the same subject manner the better. It helps you to better understand what is going to happen in the future with greater detail.


Today I want to share an example of how searching for specific key words and terms in a variety of Bible prophecy chapters and verses can help you to link chapters and verses which potentially talk about the same subject manner. The example I’ll use today is Isaiah 13 and Jeremiah 50.


Isaiah 13 is a prophecy concerning an attack on End Times Babylon during the Day of the Lord, which is a future time period during the End Times.


  • Isa 13:1 The burden of Babylon, which Isaiah the son of Amoz did see.

  • Isa 13:6 Howl ye; for the day of the LORD is at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty.
  • Isa 13:7 Therefore shall all hands be faint, and every man's heart shall melt:
  • Isa 13:8 And they shall be afraid: pangs and sorrows shall take hold of them; they shall be in pain as a woman that travaileth: they shall be amazed one at another; their faces shall be as flames.
  • Isa 13:9 Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.


I found that Isaiah 13 has several, noticeable parallels with Jeremiah 50, which is also a chapter that describes an attack on Babylon. There are at least a few people, including myself, who believe that Jeremiah 50 may potentially relate to the End Times. The tables below illustrate the apparent connection between these two chapters:


Parallel 1: The target of the attack is Babylon


Isa 13:1 The burden of Babylon, which Isaiah the son of Amoz did see.

Jer 50:9 For, lo, I will raise and cause to come up against Babylon an assembly of great nations from the north country: and they shall set themselves in array against her; from thence she shall be taken: their arrows shall be as of a mighty expert man; none shall return in vain.

Jer 50:10 And Chaldea shall be a spoil: all that spoil her shall be satisfied, saith the LORD.


Parallel 2: The invasion force consists of many great nations


Jer 50:9 For, lo, I will raise and cause to come up against Babylon an assembly of great nations from the north country: and they shall set themselves in array against her; from thence she shall be taken: their arrows shall be as of a mighty expert man; none shall return in vain.

Jer 50:10 And Chaldea shall be a spoil: all that spoil her shall be satisfied, saith the LORD.

Isa 13:4 The noise of a multitude in the mountains, like as of a great people; a tumultuous noise of the kingdoms of nations gathered together: the LORD of hosts mustereth the host of the battle.


Parallel 3: The Lord is backing this military attack


Jer 50:9 For, lo, I will raise and cause to come up against Babylon an assembly of great nations from the north country: and they shall set themselves in array against her; from thence she shall be taken: their arrowsshall be as of a mighty expert man; none shall return in vain.

Jer 50:10 And Chaldea shall be a spoil: all that spoil her shall be satisfied, saith the LORD.

Isa 13:4 The noise of a multitude in the mountains, like as of a great people; a tumultuous noise of the kingdoms of nations gathered together: the LORD of hosts mustereth the host of the battle.


Parallel 4: The “weapons of His indignation” to destroy the land (note: the term "weapons of His indignation" only appears in Jeremiah 50:25 and Isaiah 13:5)


Jer 50:25 The LORD hath opened his armoury, and hath brought forth the weapons of his indignation: for this is the work of the Lord GOD of hosts in the land of the Chaldeans.

Jer 50:26 Come against her from the utmost border, open her storehouses: cast her up as heaps, and destroy her utterly: let nothing of her be left.

Isa 13:2 Lift ye up a banner upon the high mountain, exalt the voice unto them, shake the hand, that they may go into the gates of the nobles.

Isa 13:3 I have commanded my sanctified ones, I have also called my mighty ones for mine anger, even them that rejoice in my highness.

Isa 13:4 The noise of a multitude in the mountains, like as of a great people; a tumultuous noise of the kingdoms of nations gathered together: the LORD of hosts mustereth the host of the battle.

Isa 13:5 They come from a far country, from the end of heaven, even the LORD, and the weapons of his indignation, to destroy the whole land.


Parallel 5: Babylon’s overthrow is like when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.


Isa 13:19 And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees' excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.

Isa 13:20 It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there.

Isa 13:21 But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there.

Isa 13:22 And the wild beasts of the islands shall cry in their desolate houses, and dragons in their pleasant palaces: and her time is near to come, and her days shall not be prolonged.

Jer 50:39 Therefore the wild beasts of the desert with the wild beasts of the islands shall dwell there, and the owls shall dwell therein: and it shall be no more inhabited for ever; neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation.

Jer 50:40 As God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah and the neighbour cities thereof, saith the LORD; so shall no man abide there, neither shall any son of man dwell therein.


The many parallels between Jeremiah 50 and Isaiah 13 and the clear placement of Isaiah 13 as a Day of the Lord prophecy lends credence to the idea that Jeremiah 50 has End Times implications, particularly in the Day of the Lord.


  • Whether or not these prophecies apply to a literal Babylon or Babylon the Great mentioned in Revelation 17 and Revelation 18 is something I’m still looking at. I am also still examining which nations comprise this invasion force...

I hope this article was at least somewhat informative and that the tables helped illustrate the parallels.

Providing Clarification on My Articles for the Many New Visitors

There recently has been a major increase in the number of new visitors to my blog from the interest in the May 21, 2011 speculation. Many of the new visitors may not have the time to read every single article that I have written, so the possibility exists that some people may get the wrong impression of my viewpoints towards certain subjects concerning Bible prophecy.


Today I want to clarify some things for the many new visitors to the blog who are checking it out for the first time and for those who have recently begun to read my articles.


A reader recently commented in reaction to my critique of the September 23, 2015 Rapture speculation that my blog has a “a tendency to try and debunk other revelations that has been given by God for all of our benefit”. A new visitor reading that comment, my article about the September 23, 2015 Rapture speculation, my articles on the Blood Moon Rapture speculation (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3), and my articles about the May 21, 2011 Rapture speculation might get the wrong impression that I am trying to debunk the idea that there will be a Rapture or every Rapture viewpoint in existence.


I want to make it clear that I am not trying to dispel every Rapture idea in existence. I was asked for my opinion about each of these topics, which are on the minds of a lot of people. I evaluated each of them based on my understanding of Bible prophecy. People may not like my conclusions, but I have to be honest when I see some problems with a specific theory like the May 21, 2011 Rapture theory.


  • I don’t believe I would have written about these topics if I was not asked about them. I honestly did not hear about these topics until people mentioned them to me.


I believe that the Rapture will take place in the future. I believe true believers in Jesus Christ will not have to endure the wrath of God (which events constitute the wrath of God is a different topic all together):


  • 1Th 5:9 For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,


I believe many of the things that we need to watch for before the Rapture takes place are mentioned in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21. From the clues provided in these chapters and others we can perhaps get an idea of the general timeframe when the Rapture can take place within the context of the End Times. However, I do not believe we are in a position to know the exact day and hour of the Rapture like some insist. Matthew 24:36 and Mark 13:32 are definitive in my opinion that we are not in a position to know the exact timing of the Rapture:


  • Mat 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

  • Mar 13:32 But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.


I do not believe the world is “ready” yet for the start of the End Times. I believe there are some events that still need to take place before the End Times/seventieth week of Daniel can begin. For instance,


  • I believe we may need to see a breakdown in the global economic and financial system to create the political and social instability that could help the Antichrist arise as a person on a “white horse” who “solves” the world’s problems.
  • I also believe we may need to also see greater Middle East instability in the future to create the “need” for someone like Antichrist to confirm the “covenant with many” mentioned in Daniel 9:27/the “covenant with death” mentioned in Isaiah 28:15.


I believe the world is in process of becoming more “ready” for the start of the End Times-especially these past several months. However, I believe more still needs to take place before the world is fully “ready”.


  • A few weeks ago I published an article where I posed several questions I believe are important to consider when assessing where we are in relations to the start of the End Times/seventieth week of Daniel. If you have not read it, I think it’s good article that will help people reassess where they stand on where we are in relations to the End Times: Link


Recent events in Egypt and Libya got me very interested in the prophecies concerning Libya and Egypt. While studying these prophecies I realized that I needed to also take on the challenge of Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39 since “Libya” is mentioned in Gog’s coalition (Ezekiel 38:5). The Egypt and Libya/Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39 study has transformed into a massive undertaking where I am trying to account for the placement of several dozen Bible prophecy chapters into the End Times timeline.


  • Therefore, my efforts in recent weeks have not been to critique various ideas about the Rapture’s timing, but to try to gain further understanding of several of the most challenging Bible prophecy chapters.


I want to end this article by saying that I do not know everything about what is going to happen in the future. Nobody knows everything-even those who sell millions of books and speak at major conferences don’t know everything. Bible prophecy is the biggest puzzle ever created and perhaps the most challenging one to try to piece together. The viewpoints I hold are based on my understanding of the ultimate puzzle so far, which has not been fully-pieced together by anyone yet.


  • I’m trying my best to put as many pieces of the puzzle together as I can to help others understand what will take place and to help others in their quest to put the puzzle together also. Hopefully, I can share more of my results soon…

Critiquing the September 23, 2015 Rapture Speculation

A couple of weeks ago I was asked to examine another date some people are looking to as the potential date of the Rapture: September 23, 2015. I did not know that some people were looking at that date when I was asked about it, so I was unable to provide a response until now.


I recently reviewed several websites which promote September 23, 2015 to see what kind of support its proponents use to claim that the Rapture will take place on this date.


  • Today I share my thoughts on the September 23, 2015 Rapture speculation.


The September 23, 2015 Rapture speculation begins with a non-traditional way to view Daniel’s seventy week prophecy, which is found in Daniel 9:24-27:


  • Dan 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
  • Dan 9:25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
  • Dan 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
  • Dan 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.


Many people believe that Daniel’s first sixty-nine weeks have already been fulfilled: The first week began with King Artaxerxes’s edict to rebuild Jerusalem’s walls and gates (Nehemiah 2:1-8) while the sixty-ninth week of Daniel was completed around the end of Christ’s First Coming.


In contrast, many people who believe that the Rapture will occur on September 23, 2015 believe that the first sixty-two weeks of Daniel apply to the First Coming of Christ while the next seven weeks of Daniel apply to Second Coming of Christ.


  • The first sixty-two weeks of Daniel have already been fulfilled since Christ made His First Coming nearly two thousand years ago.
  • The next seven weeks of Daniel supposedly began on the day when Israel gained control of East Jerusalem in the Six Day War: June 7, 1967, which proponents say represented the modern day call to “rebuild Jerusalem”. The seven weeks of Daniel are supposed to continue for 17,640 days (the length of seven prophetic weeks) from June 7, 1967.[1] The seven weeks of Daniel are supposed to end on September 23, 2015, which coincides with the Jewish Holiday of Yom Kippur.


Some proponents of the September 23, 2015 Rapture also claim that September 23, 2015 is the start of a Jubilee Year and even claim that Daniel’s seventy week prophecy also is a prophecy of seventy Jubilee Years.


The September 23, 2015 Rapture speculation has some connection to the Blood Moon Rapture speculation. I’ve read proponents of a September 23, 2015 Rapture date note the fact that 2015 is part of the upcoming tetrad of lunar eclipses as a reason to pay special attention to that year. My thoughts about the Blood Moon Rapture speculation can be found at the following links:



My Assessment of the Theory

In this section I discuss several of the issues I found while assessing the viability of the September 23, 2015 Rapture theory. The issues I bring up today are not all the issues I have with the theory, but are enough to give you an idea of what I think about the theory.


Before I begin, I understand that some people are excited that there are precisely seven prophetic weeks between the time when Israel gained control of East Jerusalem and Yom Kippur in 2015. In addition, I understand that people are also excited that 2015 is part of the upcoming tetrad of lunar eclipses. However, we should not let these considerations affect how we assess the theory. The theory should be evaluated based on whether it is feasible given what is found in the Bible.


A Prophecy of Seventy Jubilees?

There is nothing in Daniel 9:24-27 which suggests that the prophecy of the seventy weeks is also a prophecy of seventy Jubilees.


  • The Hebrew translation of the word “week” in Daniel is shâbûa‛, which actually means “seven”. “Seven” has nothing to do with Jubilee Years, which come once every fifty years (Leviticus 25:8-10).


In addition, even if Daniel’s seventy weeks also represented seventy Jubilees, September 23, 2015 would not be the start of the seventieth Jubilee year.


  • Some proponents of September 23, 2015 cite Luke 4’s account of Christ reading Isaiah 61:1-2 in the temple at the start of His Ministry as the start of a Jubilee Year. If you subtract multiples of 49 years or multiples of 50 years from September 23, 2015 all the way back 2,000+ years you will not have a Jubilee Year anytime near Christ’s Ministry under a September 23, 2015 Jubilee Year scenario.
  • Even if September 23, 2015 was a Jubilee Year, it would not be the seventieth Jubilee if you apply the prophecy given in Daniel 9:24-27. Daniel 9:25 suggests that the first week began with the call to restore and build Jerusalem. Using the seventy Jubilees logic, the call to restore and build Jerusalem should be the first Jubilee. If you add the timeframe of sixty-nine or seventy Jubilee cycles to that time period you will get a time period near the year 3,000 A.D. That’s way too far into the future…

A Jubilee Year?

How do some proponents of a September 23, 2015 Rapture date know that September 23, 2015 represents the start of a Jubilee Year? The articles I read were eager to proclaim that September 2015 is the start of a Jubilee Year, but they did not provide much evidence to support that conclusion…


The Possibility of Only 62 Weeks

For sake of argument, let’s assume for a moment that only the first sixty-two weeks were fulfilled at Christ’s First Coming. Recall that Daniel 9:25 suggests that the first week began with the call to build and restore Jerusalem. Consequently, the time between the call to restore and build Jerusalem and the time when Christ was “cut off” should be sixty-two weeks or 156,240 days.[2]


For sake of argument, let’s take Friday April 1, 33 A.D. as the date when Christ was “cut off” (I know some people may disagree with this date, but I am just using this date for illustrative purposes). If we subtract 156,240 days from Friday April 1, 33 A.D., we’ll end up going back in time to June 24, 396 B.C.


  • This date is too late to represent the start of the rebuilding of Jerusalem. Nehemiah began the process of rebuilding Jerusalem’s walls and gates several decades earlier (circa 444 B.C.).
  • In contrast, viewing the first sixty-nine weeks of Daniel as a time period from King Artaxerxes’s edict to rebuild Jerusalem’s walls and gates to Christ’s First Coming works: Link
  • Therefore, it is highly unlikely that there are only sixty-two weeks separating the call to rebuild Jerusalem and the end of Christ’s First Coming.

Matthew 24:36

We should not forget that Christ said that no one knows the day and hour of His Coming. Only His Father knows…


  • Mat 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.


The proponents of a September 23, 2015 Rapture date are challenging this verse in my opinion by telling you that September 23, 2015 is the date of the Rapture.


It’s Speculation

Finally, it’s worth noting that some proponents of September 23, 2015 Rapture originally used this date to conclude that the End Times would begin in 2008. There has been no seven year peace treaty agreed to yet at the time of this writing (May 13, 2011), so I highly doubt that the End Times began in 2008.


  • This is an example of how September 23, 2015 theory is speculation which can be disproved with the passage of time.

My View
I do not view the September 23, 2015 Rapture theory as a viable one because of its inability to deal with the first sixty-two weeks of Daniel adequately. In addition, I do not see any connection between Yom Kippur 2015 and a Jubilee Year. Finally, I believe the theory is a challenge to Matthew 24:36 which suggests that only the Father knows the date and the hour.


Notes


[1] 7 Prophetic Weeks x 7 (Prophetic Years/Prophetic Week) x 360 (Days/Prophetic Year) = 17,640 Days

[2] 62 Prophetic Weeks x 7 (Prophetic Years/Prophetic Week) x 360 (Days/Prophetic Year) = 156,240 Days

Another Update on My Study on Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39: Examining Ezekiel 39:11 vs. Joel 2:20

I wrote almost two weeks ago that I could begin to publish articles about Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39 as soon as the next week (which would have been last week) if things worked out. Several days have passed since then, yet there have been no in-depth articles published.


The reason I have not begun to publish any in-depth articles is that I am trying to gain a further understanding of several chapters relating to Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39 simultaneously. I want to avoid a situation where I publish an article where I say something that I have to take completely back a few days later…


The past couple of days I’ve been trying to figure out whether the army in Joel 2 is the same army mentioned in Ezekiel 39.


  • It is very important to find out whether there is a connection between the army in Joel 2 and the army mentioned in Ezekiel 39 because it may provide a clearer indication of when the events of Joel 2 may occur and potentially link Ezekiel 39 with other prophecies in the Bible which may be related to Joel 2 (i.e. Isaiah 13, which I’ll explain in a future article).


Today I want to provide an update on my ongoing study by sharing some of my observations about Joel 2:20 and Ezekiel 39:11.


  • I feel it is useful to share some of my observations since the process of writing about my observations helps me to collect my thoughts and may help give someone who is also studying these two verses and/or Joel 2 and Ezekiel 39 something to consider. Unfortunately, there are not a lot of articles on the Internet that examine Joel 2:20 and Ezekiel 39:11 closely…


Gog’s Ezekiel 39 army and the army in Joel 2 share the common characteristic of invading from the north:


Eze 39:1 Therefore, thou son of man, prophesy against Gog, and say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal:

Eze 39:2 And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel

Joe 2:20 But I will remove far off from you the northernarmy, and will drive him into a land barren and desolate, with his face toward the east sea, and his hinder part toward the utmost sea, and his stink shall come up, and his ill savour shall come up, because he hath done great things.


This parallel alone has made some people conclude that these armies are identical.


  • I personally would like to find more evidence than this parallel before I am ready to say that these two armies are identical…


Another parallel is that the Lord will defeat the northern army and Gog's army:


Eze 39:3 And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand


Joe 2:20 But I will remove far off from you the northern army, and will drive him into a land barren and desolate, with his face toward the east sea, and his hinder part toward the utmost sea, and his stink shall come up, and his ill savour shall come up, because he hath done great things.


The detail about the origins of the army is not the only detail found in Joel 2:20 concerning the army. Joel 2:20 also suggests that the Lord promises to remove the northern army and to have the defeated army face towards the east sea (the Dead Sea) and the back portion towards the utmost sea (the Mediterranean Sea). In addition, Joel 2:20 indicates that the smell of the corpses will be extremely noticeable:


  • Joe 2:20 But I will remove far off from you the northern army, and will drive him into a land barren and desolate, with his face toward the east sea, and his hinder part toward the utmost sea, and his stink shall come up, and his ill savour shall come up, because he hath done great things.


I believe Ezekiel 39:11 could potentially provide at least another link to connect Joel 2 with Ezekiel 39. Ezekiel 39:11 says the following about Gog’s defeated army:


  • Eze 39:11 And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will give unto Gog a place there of graves in Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the noses of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog and all his multitude: and they shall call it The valley of Hamongog.


Some people discount the possibility that Gog’s Ezekiel 39 army is the same army as the one mentioned in Joel 2 since Ezekiel 39:11 apparently says that Gog’s army is buried “east of the sea” (the Dead Sea) while the remains of the northern army mentioned in Joel is between the Mediterranean Sea and the Dead Sea.


I examined several Bible commentaries to figure out if there were any nuisances I missed in Ezekiel 39:11. The Keil and Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament analysis of Ezekiel 39 included an interesting statement about the usage/definition of the word “east” (Hebrew קדמה) in Ezekiel 39:11:


“The definition indicates this, viz., קִדְמַת, on the front of the sea; not to the east of the sea, as it is generally rendered, for קִדְמַת never has this meaning”


In other words, the translation “east of the sea” in Ezekiel 39:11 is very questionable in the minds of Keil and Delitzsch. Instead, the Keil and Delitzsch suggested that the term actually means "on the front of the sea". Keil and Delitzsch also suggested that the remnant of the corpses of Gog’s army will be located “above” the Dead Sea at the Jordan Valley rather than “east of the sea” .


  • I don’t know for sure if I agree with Keil and Delitzsch yet, but I am considering what they wrote about the word קִדְמַת and what they proposed about the location of the army’s remains. Their analysis on this issue opens up the possibility for the remains of Gog’s forces to be located where Joel suggested the remains of the northern army will be…
  • It’s worth noting that the word קִדְמַת only appears four times in the Old Testament. There is a different Hebrew word used in Old Testament to denote “east” the majority of the time.


Another interesting thing I noticed is that the King James Bible (the Bible version I believe is the most accurate of the existing versions) is the only major Bible translation that has the phrase “it shall stop the noses of the passengers” in Ezekiel 39:11.


  • Eze 39:11 And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will give unto Gog a place there of graves in Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the noses of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog and all his multitude: and they shall call it The valley of Hamongog.


Meanwhile, the other major Bible translations like the NIV and the NASB suggest that people will be blocked by the remains of Gog’s army.


Ezekiel 39:11 Comparison

KJV

NIV

NASB

And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will give unto Gog a place there of graves in Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the noses of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog and all his multitude: and they shall call itThe valley of Hamongog.

On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, in the valley of those who travel east toward the Sea. It will block the way of travelers, because Gog and all his hordes will be buried there. So it will be called the Valley of Hamon Gog.

Eze 39:11 On that day I will give Gog a burial ground there in Israel, the valley of those who pass by east of the sea, and it will block off those who would pass by. So they will bury Gog there with all his horde, and they will call it the valley of Hamon-gog.


The phrase “it shall stop the noses of the passengers” is an important phrase to examine because it may provide another parallel between Ezekiel 39 and Joel 2.


  • If the King James translation of Ezekiel 39:11 is consistent with the idea conveyed in the Hebrew text then we can say that people will be stopped by the stench of Gog’s army remains.
  • Recall that Joel 2:20 indicates that there is going to be a strong stench emanating from the remains of the northern army.


The Hebrew word châsam (חסם) is the word that the King James Bible uses in Ezekiel 39:11 to come up with the expression “it shall stop the noses”. According to Strong’s Greek and Hebrew Dictionary, the word means to “to muzzle; by analogy to stop the nose: - muzzle, stop”.


The only other time where the word “châsam” is found in the Bible is Deuteronomy 25:4:


  • Deu 25:4 Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn.


Keil and Delitzsch believe that the word “châsam” in Ezekiel 39:11 probably means “to stop” based on an Arabic translation. Meanwhile, the study notes of the Geneva Study Bible for Ezekiel 39:11 suggest that people will be stopped by the stink of the carcasses.


  • The usage of the word châsam is so unusual and rare that is hard to get a grasp of what the text is trying to convey with regards to people being stopped by the remains of Gog’s army. However, I can imagine people being stopped by the stench since many dead corpses will be sitting above the ground for several months…


I plan to spend some more time comparing Ezekiel 39 and Joel 2. Once I have made a determination of whether these chapters speak of the same army or not I should be close to being ready to begin writing in-depth articles relating to Ezekiel 38 and Ezekiel 39.


Please feel free to share whether you think the northern army mentioned in Joel 2 is the same or different than Gog’s army in Ezekiel 39 (if you have an opinion on the topic). Perhaps you may have noticed something about these two chapters that I have not noticed yet...